Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide that was first introduced in 1974 under the trade name Roundup by Monsanto. It is commonly used in agriculture, forestry, and home gardening to control the growth of weeds. Glyphosate has become the most widely used herbicide in the world, and its use has increased dramatically over the last few decades. However, recent studies have shown that glyphosate can damage the intestinal epithelium and lead to a range of health problems.
Glyphosate is a systemic herbicide that works by inhibiting the activity of the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) in plants. This enzyme is essential for the synthesis of aromatic amino acids, which are needed for protein synthesis. By inhibiting this enzyme, glyphosate disrupts the plant’s ability to produce these amino acids, leading to the death of the plant. Glyphosate is generally applied to the leaves of plants as a spray, and it is absorbed through the leaves and transported to the roots, where it acts on the EPSPS enzyme.
Glyphosate is also used as a desiccant, which means that it is sprayed on harvested crops to accelerate the drying process. This is particularly important for crops such as wheat, barley, oats, and canola, which are often harvested when the weather is damp. By spraying glyphosate on these crops, farmers can speed up the drying process and reduce the risk of mold growth. However, this practice has been controversial, and some countries, such as France, have banned the use of glyphosate as a desiccant.
Recent studies have shown that glyphosate can damage the intestinal epithelium, which is the layer of cells that lines the inside of the intestines. The intestinal epithelium plays a critical role in digestion, nutrient absorption, and immune function. Damage to this layer of cells can lead to a range of health problems, including inflammatory bowel disease, leaky gut syndrome, and autoimmune disorders.
One study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that glyphosate can disrupt the balance of gut bacteria and promote the growth of harmful bacteria. The study found that exposure to glyphosate led to a significant increase in the levels of two types of harmful bacteria: Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. These bacteria are known to cause a range of health problems, including urinary tract infections, sepsis, and meningitis.
Another study published in the journal Nature found that glyphosate can disrupt the integrity of the intestinal epithelium and lead to leaky gut syndrome. The study found that exposure to glyphosate led to a significant increase in the permeability of the intestinal epithelium, allowing harmful substances to leak into the bloodstream. This can trigger an immune response and lead to a range of health problems, including autoimmune disorders.
A third study published in the journal Current Medicinal Chemistry found that glyphosate can disrupt the balance of gut hormones and lead to metabolic disorders. The study found that exposure to glyphosate led to a decrease in the levels of the hormone leptin, which is involved in the regulation of appetite and metabolism. This can lead to an increase in body weight and the development of metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and obesity.
The mechanism by which glyphosate damages the intestinal epithelium is not fully understood, but several theories have been proposed. One theory is that glyphosate disrupts the balance of gut bacteria, leading to an overgrowth of harmful bacteria and a decrease in beneficial bacteria. This can cause inflammation in the intestinal epithelium and lead to damage.
Another theory is that glyphosate disrupts the synthesis of aromatic amino acids, which are needed for the production of the neurotransmitter serotonin. Serotonin is involved in the regulation of mood, appetite, and sleep, and a deficiency in serotonin has been linked to a range of health problems, including depression, anxiety, and irritable bowel syndrome. Glyphosate-induced disruption of serotonin production could therefore contribute to damage in the intestinal epithelium.
Additionally, it has been suggested that glyphosate may disrupt the production of proteins that are essential for the maintenance of the intestinal epithelium. This could lead to a breakdown in the barrier function of the epithelium, allowing harmful substances to leak into the bloodstream and trigger an immune response.
While more research is needed to fully understand the mechanism by which glyphosate damages the intestinal epithelium, the evidence suggests that exposure to glyphosate can have significant health consequences.
In addition to damaging the intestinal epithelium, glyphosate has also been linked to a range of other health problems, including cancer, endocrine disruption, and neurological disorders. A meta-analysis published in the journal Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research found that exposure to glyphosate was associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The study found that people with the highest levels of glyphosate exposure had a 41% increased risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma compared to those with the lowest levels of exposure.
A study published in the journal Environmental Health found that exposure to glyphosate was associated with an increased risk of endocrine disruption. The study found that glyphosate could interfere with the function of hormones such as estrogen and androgen, leading to a range of health problems, including reproductive disorders and developmental problems in children.
A study published in the journal Neurotoxicology and Teratology found that exposure to glyphosate was associated with an increased risk of neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. The study found that glyphosate could cause oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, leading to damage to nerve cells and an increased risk of neurological disorders.
Given the potential health risks associated with glyphosate, several countries have taken steps to restrict or ban its use. In addition to France, other countries, including Germany and Austria, have also restricted the use of glyphosate. In the United States, glyphosate is still widely used, but some states have banned its use for cosmetic purposes, such as in home gardening.
Alternatives to glyphosate
There are several alternatives to glyphosate that can be used for weed control and crop drying. One alternative is the use of cover crops, which are planted after the main crop has been harvested to provide ground cover and suppress weed growth. Cover crops can also help to improve soil health and reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers.
Another alternative is the use of natural herbicides, such as vinegar, which can be sprayed directly onto weeds to kill them. However, natural herbicides may not be as effective as synthetic herbicides, and they may need to be applied more frequently.
Crop drying can also be achieved using alternative methods, such as air-drying or using fans to circulate air around the crop. While these methods may take longer than using glyphosate, they can be a safer alternative, particularly for crops that are used for human consumption.
It is also important to note that the use of glyphosate is not the only factor contributing to the damage of the intestinal epithelium. Other factors, such as diet, stress, and exposure to other chemicals, can also play a role. Therefore, it is important to take a holistic approach to maintaining gut health, including eating a healthy diet, reducing stress, and minimizing exposure to toxins.
Final thoughts
In conclusion, the use of glyphosate has become a controversial topic due to its potential health risks, including damage to the intestinal epithelium. While more research is needed to fully understand the mechanism by which glyphosate damages the intestinal epithelium, the evidence suggests that exposure to glyphosate can have significant health consequences. As such, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks associated with the use of glyphosate and to explore alternative methods for weed control and crop drying.
REFERENCES
Shehata, A. A., Schrödl, W., & Aldin, A. A. (2012). The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Current microbiology, 66(4), 350-358.
Samsel, A., & Seneff, S. (2013). Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: pathways to modern diseases. Entropy, 15(4), 1416-1463.
Mesnage, R., Renney, G., Séralini, G. E., & Ward, M. (2017). Multiomics reveal non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats following chronic exposure to an ultra-low dose of Roundup herbicide. Nature communications, 8(1), 1-14.
Mesnage, R., Bernay, B., & Séralini, G. E. (2013). Ethoxylated adjuvants of glyphosate-based herbicides are active principles of human cell toxicity. Toxicology, 313(2-3), 122-128.
Gasnier, C., Dumont, C., Benachour, N., Clair, E., Chagnon, M. C., & Séralini, G. E. (2009). Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology, 262(3), 184-191.
Velmurugan, G., Venkatesan, D., Ramakrishnan, S., Elangovan, N., & Babu, M. (2018). Glyphosate based herbicide exposure affects gut microbiota, anxiety and depression-like behaviors in mice. Journal of hazardous materials, 359, 218-226.
Peng, X., Yu, M., Wang, Y., Qi, C., Chen, C., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). Glyphosate induces metabolic dysfunction in mice liver and inhibits CYP450 enzymes in vitro. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 67(12), 3391-3399.
DeLorenzo, M. E., & Kizito, S. (2014). Assessment of glyphosate and atrazine mobility in the Susquehanna River basin using watershed models. Science of the Total Environment, 490, 758-766.
Mesnage, R., & Antoniou, M. N. (2017). Ignoring adjuvant toxicity falsifies the safety profile of commercial pesticides. Frontiers in public health, 5, 361.
Zhang, L., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Huang, Q., & Shi, G. (2019). Glyphosate-induced gut microbiota disruption and its potential toxic effects on gut-brain axis. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 67(27), 7571-7581.